Fix spans and error reporting for backpassing.

This commit is contained in:
KtorZ 2024-03-11 00:16:08 +01:00
parent a57dcf3307
commit 7e8e959251
No known key found for this signature in database
GPG Key ID: 33173CB6F77F4277
1 changed files with 36 additions and 17 deletions

View File

@ -999,12 +999,26 @@ impl<'a, 'b> ExprTyper<'a, 'b> {
},
pattern_location: untyped_pattern.location(),
value_location: untyped_value.location(),
sample: UntypedExpr::Assignment {
location: Span::empty(),
value: Box::new(untyped_value),
pattern: untyped_pattern,
kind: AssignmentKind::Let { backpassing: false },
annotation: None,
sample: match untyped_value {
UntypedExpr::Var { name, .. } if name == ast::BACKPASS_VARIABLE => {
UntypedExpr::Assignment {
location: Span::empty(),
value: Box::new(UntypedExpr::Var {
name: "...".to_string(),
location: Span::empty(),
}),
pattern: untyped_pattern,
kind: AssignmentKind::Let { backpassing: true },
annotation: None,
}
}
_ => UntypedExpr::Assignment {
location: Span::empty(),
value: Box::new(untyped_value),
pattern: untyped_pattern,
kind: AssignmentKind::let_(),
annotation: None,
},
},
});
}
@ -1720,6 +1734,16 @@ impl<'a, 'b> ExprTyper<'a, 'b> {
_ => unreachable!("backpass misuse: breakpoint isn't an Assignment ?!"),
};
let value_location = value.location();
let call_location = Span {
start: value_location.end,
end: continuation
.last()
.map(|expr| expr.location().end)
.unwrap_or_else(|| value_location.end),
};
// In case where we have a Pattern that isn't simply a let-binding to a name, we do insert an extra let-binding
// in front of the continuation sequence. This is because we do not support patterns in function argument
// (which is perhaps something we should support?).
@ -1749,15 +1773,11 @@ impl<'a, 'b> ExprTyper<'a, 'b> {
};
match *value {
UntypedExpr::Call {
location: call_location,
fun,
arguments,
} => {
UntypedExpr::Call { fun, arguments, .. } => {
let mut new_arguments = Vec::new();
new_arguments.extend(arguments);
new_arguments.push(CallArg {
location: assign_location,
location: call_location,
label: None,
value: UntypedExpr::lambda(name, continuation, call_location),
});
@ -1776,7 +1796,6 @@ impl<'a, 'b> ExprTyper<'a, 'b> {
// Now, whether this leads to an invalid call usage, that's not *our* immediate
// problem.
UntypedExpr::Fn {
location: call_location,
fn_style,
ref arguments,
ref return_annotation,
@ -1790,7 +1809,7 @@ impl<'a, 'b> ExprTyper<'a, 'b> {
location: call_location,
fun: value,
arguments: vec![CallArg {
location: assign_location,
location: call_location,
label: None,
value: UntypedExpr::lambda(name, continuation, call_location),
}],
@ -1814,12 +1833,12 @@ impl<'a, 'b> ExprTyper<'a, 'b> {
// type-checker will catch that eventually in exactly the same way as if the code was
// written like that to begin with.
_ => UntypedExpr::Call {
location: assign_location,
location: call_location,
fun: value,
arguments: vec![CallArg {
location: assign_location,
location: call_location,
label: None,
value: UntypedExpr::lambda(name, continuation, assign_location),
value: UntypedExpr::lambda(name, continuation, call_location),
}],
},
}