For the program to be consistent, the 'EventListener' target that we
pass to a Project should be responsible for the output format.
Otherwise, we are contingent on developers to remember passing the
option at call-site. Plus, it overloads the project code with an extra
boolean option.
Instead, since the behaviour is solely driven by the execution
context, we can instantiate a different event target upfront, and
simply hold on to it throughout the program.
As a nice side-effect, we can gently re-organize the code to keep the
terminal printing logic and the json printing logic separate.
Avoid the interface to hang for several seconds without feedback when counterexamples are being simplified. This sends a heads-up to the user to indicate that a research of a counter example is going on.
The playground doesn't / cannot depend on aiken-project because that becomes a gigantic pain. So instead, we try to keep essential stuff inside aiken-lang when possible.
This is very very rough at the moment. But it does a couple of thing:
1. The 'ArgVia' now contains an Expr/TypedExpr which should unify to a Fuzzer. This is to avoid having to introduce custom logic to handle fuzzer referencing. So this now accepts function call, field access etc.. so long as they unify to the right thing.
2. I've done quite a lot of cleanup in aiken-project mostly around the tests and the naming surrounding them. What we used to call 'Script' is now called 'Test' and is an enum between UnitTest (ex-Script) and PropertyTest. I've moved some boilerplate and relevant function under those module Impl.
3. I've completed the end-to-end pipeline of:
- Compiling the property test
- Compiling the fuzzer
- Generating an initial seed
- Running property tests sequentially, threading the seed through each step.
An interesting finding is that, I had to wrap the prop test in a similar wrapper that we use for validator, to ensure we convert primitive types wrapped in Data back to UPLC terms. This is necessary because the fuzzer return a ProtoPair (and soon an Array) which holds 'Data'.
At the moment, we do nothing with the size, though the size should ideally grow after each iteration (up to a certain cap).
In addition, there are a couple of todo/fixme that I left in the code as reminders of what's left to do beyond the obvious (error and success reporting, testing, etc..)
Also removed the 'clear' flag to do it by default instead of clogging
the terminal view.
This now works pretty nicely, and the logic is back under
`aiken_project`.
When the version isn't a git sha or a tag, we always check that we got
the last version of a particular dependency before building. This is
to avoid those awkward moments where someone try to use something from
the stdlib that is brand new, and despite using 'main' they get a
strange build failure regarding how it's not available.
An important note is that we don't actually re-download the package
when the case occurs; we merely check an HTTP ETag from a (cheap) 'HEAD'
request on the package registry. If the tag hasn't changed then that
means the local version is correct.
The behavior is completely bypassed if the version is specified using
a git sha or a tag, as here, we can assume that fetching it once it
enough (and that it can change). If a package maintainer force-pushed
a tag however, there may be discrepency and the only way around that
is to `rm -r ./build`.
The blueprint is generated at the root of the repository and is
intended to be versioned with the rest. It acts as a business card
that contains many practical information. There's a variety of tools
we can then build on top of open-source contracts. And, quite
importantly, the blueprint is language-agnostic; it isn't specific to
Aiken. So it is really meant as an interop format within the
ecosystem.
KtorZ