-> The provided Plutus code called 'error'.
This scenario _could_ work if `choose_data` was lazy in its arguments.
Which is a reasonable thing to expect from `choose_data`. Since we
don't have any way to introduce on-demand lazyness in the language
(and we are not looking for ways), we need to make a special case for
`choose_data` which is a perfect (and singular) use case for it.
Editor configurations and other system-specific files aren't meant to
be committed to public repository. This belongs to a dev environment
and should be handled by developers themselves though local git
configurations.
-Builitins IR now acts like Record IR in terms of argument consumption
-UnConstrData returns as Pair(Data,Data) to conform with how pairs are treated behind the scenes.
This is not supported by the code generation, so it's a bit of a lie
to have them in the language in the first place. There's arguably not
even any use for constant records, list and tuples to begin with. So
this cleans this up everywhere for the sake of moving forward with the
alpha release.
This now reduces constants to:
- Integer
- ByteArray
- String
Anything else can be declared via a function anyway. We can revisit
this choice later.... or not.
```
Error:
× Main thread panicked.
├─▶ at crates/uplc/src/optimize.rs:16:68
╰─▶ called `Result::unwrap()` on an `Err` value: FreeUnique(Name { text: "tests_bar", unique: Unique(1) })
```
```
Error:
× Main thread panicked.
├─▶ at crates/uplc/src/optimize.rs:16:68
╰─▶ called `Result::unwrap()` on an `Err` value: FreeUnique(Name { text: "tests_bar", unique: Unique(1) })
```
**a**
```
× Main thread panicked.
├─▶ at crates/uplc/src/optimize.rs:16:68
╰─▶ called `Result::unwrap()` on an `Err` value: FreeUnique(Name { text: "__other_clauses_delayed", unique: Unique(13) })
```
**b**
```
× Main thread panicked.
├─▶ at crates/aiken-lang/src/builder.rs:771:14
╰─▶ not yet implemented: Assign
```
**c**
```
× choice_4 failed
help: ┍━ left ━━━━━━━━━━━━━┑
│ (con data #d87a80) │
┕━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━┙
should be equal to
┍━ right ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━┑
│ (con data #d8799f182aff) │
┕━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━┙
```
This however enforces that the argument unifies to a `String`. So this
is more flexible than the previous form, but does fundamentally the
same thing.
Fixes#378.
Not sure what this special case was trying to achieve, but it's not right. There's no need to handle function call with a single argument differently than the others.
List Clauses patterns handle var cases
Fixed Tuple Clauses issue with last clause not being a tuple
Redid how zero arg functions and dependencies are handled. Tough one lol
Kasey White