True corresponds to Constr=1 and False corresponds to Constr=0; their position in the vector shall reflect that. Note that while this would in principle impact codegen for any other type, it doesn't for bool since we likely never looked up this type definition since it is well-known. It does now as the 'reify' function relies on this. Whoopsie.
This is very very rough at the moment. But it does a couple of thing:
1. The 'ArgVia' now contains an Expr/TypedExpr which should unify to a Fuzzer. This is to avoid having to introduce custom logic to handle fuzzer referencing. So this now accepts function call, field access etc.. so long as they unify to the right thing.
2. I've done quite a lot of cleanup in aiken-project mostly around the tests and the naming surrounding them. What we used to call 'Script' is now called 'Test' and is an enum between UnitTest (ex-Script) and PropertyTest. I've moved some boilerplate and relevant function under those module Impl.
3. I've completed the end-to-end pipeline of:
- Compiling the property test
- Compiling the fuzzer
- Generating an initial seed
- Running property tests sequentially, threading the seed through each step.
An interesting finding is that, I had to wrap the prop test in a similar wrapper that we use for validator, to ensure we convert primitive types wrapped in Data back to UPLC terms. This is necessary because the fuzzer return a ProtoPair (and soon an Array) which holds 'Data'.
At the moment, we do nothing with the size, though the size should ideally grow after each iteration (up to a certain cap).
In addition, there are a couple of todo/fixme that I left in the code as reminders of what's left to do beyond the obvious (error and success reporting, testing, etc..)
The parameter is special as it takes no annotation but a 'via' keyword followed by an expression that should unify to a Fuzzer<a>, where Fuzzer<a> = fn(Seed) -> (Seed, a). The current commit only allow name identifiers for now. Ultimately, this may allow full expressions.
While looking at some code, I noticed that this
warning would show up even if an error for a
non-exhaustive when/is shows up for the same when/is
expression. This isn't a useful situation to show this
warning because things are not exhaustive yet so we should
let the user finish and only provide the errors. If things
are exhaustive then the code proceeds and if a warning was set
when there's only one clause pattern then this warning message
can be pushed because that's when it's actually useful.
This commit allows Data to be optionally annotated with a
phantom-type. This doesn't change anything in codegen but we can now
leverage this information to generate better blueprint schemas.
Note that the formatter rewrite parens-block sequences as curly-block
sequences anyway. Albeit weird looking syntax, they are valid
nonetheless.
I also clarified a bit the hints and description of the
'illegal::return' error as it would mistakenly say 'function' instead
of 'block'.
KtorZ