Weirdly enough, we got the parsing wrong for byte literals in expressions (but did okay in constants). But got the formatting wrong in constants (yet did okay for formatting expressions). I've factored out the code in both cases to avoid the duplication that led to this in the first place. Plus added test coverage to make sure this doesn't happen in the future.
In an ideal world, I should have handlded that directly at the conflicting commit in the rebase, but this would have bubbled up through all commits... which I wasn't really quite keen on going through. So here's an extra ugly commit that comes and 'fix the rebase'.
This is quite something, because now we have a testing pipeline that
can also be used for testing other compiler-related stuff such as the
type-checker or the code generator.
The blueprint is generated at the root of the repository and is
intended to be versioned with the rest. It acts as a business card
that contains many practical information. There's a variety of tools
we can then build on top of open-source contracts. And, quite
importantly, the blueprint is language-agnostic; it isn't specific to
Aiken. So it is really meant as an interop format within the
ecosystem.
With pretty parse errors on failures. The type-checker was already
implemented for those, so it now only requires some work in the code
generation.
Fixes#297.
This is a bit annoying as we are forced to use #[related] here which isn't quite what we want.
Ideally, this would use #[diagnostic_source] but, there's a bug upstream. See: zkat/miette#172.
In the similar spirit to what we did for sequences. Yet, we need to handle the case of body being just an assignment -- or a trace of an assignment which is basically the same thing.
Far less verbose than defining classes by hand, plus, it allows to have everything about a single error be co-located. And finally, it allows to use 'related', 'label' and so on more easily.
