Alongside a bunch of other stuff from the coverage list. In
particular, the mint transaction contains:
- reference inputs
- multiple outputs, with assets, and type-0, type-1 and type-6
addresses.
- an output with a datum hash
- an output with an inline script
- carries an extra datum witness, preimage of the embedded hash
- mint, with 2 policies purposely ordered wrongly, with 1 and 2
assets purposely ordered wrong. One of the mint is actually a
burn (i.e. negative quantity)
This is intense, as we still want to preserve the serializer for V1 &
V2, and I've tried as much as possible to avoid polluting the
application layer with many enum types such as:
```
pub enum TxOut {
V1(TransactionOutput),
V2(TransactionOutput),
V3(TransactionOutput),
}
```
Those types make working with the script context cumbersome, and are
only truly required to provide different serialisation strategies. So
instead, we keep one top-level `TxInfo V1/V2/V3` type, and we ensure
to pass serialization strategies as type wrappers.
This way, the strategy propagates through the structure up until it's
eliminated when it reaches the relevant types.
All-in-all, this strikes a correct balance between maintainability and
repetition; and it makes it possible to define _different but mostly
identical_ encoders for the various versions.
With it, I've been able to successfully encode a V3 script context and
match it against one produced using the Haskell libraries. More to
come.
This is mainly a syntactic trick/sugar, but it's been pretty annoying
to me for a while that we can't simply pattern-match/destructure
single-variant constructors directly from the args list. A classic
example is when writing property tests:
```ak
test foo(params via both(bytearray(), int())) {
let (bytes, ix) = params
...
}
```
Now can be replaced simply with:
```
test foo((bytes, ix) via both(bytearray(), int())) {
...
}
```
If feels natural, especially coming from the JavaScript, Haskell or
Rust worlds and is mostly convenient. Behind the scene, the compiler
does nothing more than re-writing the AST as the first form, with
pre-generated arg names. Then, we fully rely on the existing
type-checking capabilities and thus, works in a seamless way as if we
were just pattern matching inline.
KtorZ