Refactor get_uplc_type to account for constr types that don't exactly resolve to a uplc type
Check arg_stack in uplc generator has only 1 argument at the end of the generation
warning fixes
Currently, pattern-matching on 'Pair' is handled by treating Pair as a
record, which comes as slightly odd given that it isn't actually a
record and isn't user-defined. Thus now, every use of a record must
distinguish between Pairs and other kind of records -- which screams
for another variant constructor instead.
We cannot use `Tuple` either for this, because then we have no ways to
tell 2-tuples apart from pairs, which is the whole point here. So the
most sensical thing to do is to define a new pattern `Pair` which is
akin to tuples, but simpler since we know the number of elements and
it's always 2.
Discard pattern are _dangerous_ is used recklessly. The problem comes
from maintenance and when adding new fields. We usually don't get any
compiler warnings which may lead to missing spots and confusing
behaviors.
So I have, in some cases, inline discard to explicitly list all
fields. That's a bit more cumbersome to write but hopefully will catch
a few things for us in the future.
Before this commit, we would always show the 'declared form' of type aliases, with their generic, non-instantiated parameters. This now tries to unify the annotation with the underlying inferred type to provide even better alias pretty printing.
This commit allows Data to be optionally annotated with a
phantom-type. This doesn't change anything in codegen but we can now
leverage this information to generate better blueprint schemas.
This is not supported by the code generation, so it's a bit of a lie
to have them in the language in the first place. There's arguably not
even any use for constant records, list and tuples to begin with. So
this cleans this up everywhere for the sake of moving forward with the
alpha release.
This now reduces constants to:
- Integer
- ByteArray
- String
Anything else can be declared via a function anyway. We can revisit
this choice later.... or not.
Due to how PlutusData works it doesn't make sense
to allow user defined types to contain
functions.
```
type Foo {
bar: fn(Int) -> Int
}
```
The above definition will now return an error.
microproofs