4f7f39292d
When rendering missing or redundant patterns, linked-list would wrongly suggest the last nil constructor as a pattern on non-empty list. For example, before this commit, the exhaustivness checker would yield: ``` [(_, True), []] ``` as a suggestion, for being the result of being a list pattern with a single argument being `(_, True) :: Nil`. Blindly following the compiler suggestion here would cause a type unification error (since `[]` doesn't unify with a 2-tuple). Indeed, we mustn't render the Nil constructor when rendering non-empty lists! So the correct suggestion should be: ``` [(_, True)] ``` |
||
|---|---|---|
| .. | ||
| aiken | ||
| aiken-lang | ||
| aiken-lsp | ||
| aiken-project | ||
| flat-rs | ||
| uplc | ||